This means building on current knowledge as a social process, completely away from the objectivist perspective that has dominated science for years, claims that there are many realities as existing subjects which are created in a joint process of co-constructing meanings giving end in a cluster of social representations, the importance of language prevailing in this development. The same applies to the meaning of the experiences, although they are reproducible between individuals (ie, the experiences are different from one subject to another) the concept of intersubjectivity can reply to the common world between the meanings and shared a similar outlook access group to interact and communicate. This common world is translated into a continuous adjustment of the similar views of the subjects, being this dynamism used as an instrumental means for the interaction of people, therefore intersubjectivity is inherent in life, is a reality that is among the individuals and institutions, or between individual and individual, or between community and community, etc., ie corresponds to a set "of symbols, meanings and senses processed, and does not belong to anyone but the protagonists all belonging to her, and aimed at first and ultimately the community" (Fernandez , 1994 p.51), is the sense that leads to talk to some extent a sense and allows understood in a collective thus forms both a triadic structure. Is also how this structure is inserted into a symbolic universe, which is the matrix of all socially and subjectively objectified meanings real into this case the historical society, the biography of an individual and marginal situations (understood in this way because they are particularly experienced by the subject, therefore, not included in the reality of everyday existence in society), these symbolic universes are social products full of history, present and future which form a coherent mixture ( Berger and Luckman, 2001).
0 comments:
Post a Comment