Who has not ever tried to enter a group?, who has not changed its way of thinking or acting?, who has not been driven by what other people think?
Some of these questions are answered by the two forms of social influence, outstanding at the theoretical level: conformity and obedience. Then I will make known the first relying on the writings of John M. Mark A. Levine Pavelchak.
What is meant by compliance?
This is when a person modifies their behavior or attitude to be consistent, identical or similar to the behavior or attitude of the group is conducted by pairs of equal status and should not necessarily influence or monitor, pressure or who will comply. But if once formed the subject, this pressure goes, it is most likely not continue subscribing to the group's position, provided that the compliance process has been given through public agreement or submission (this will not be the same in the case of private agreement or acceptance, as the depth of the commitment level is higher).
There are several factors that influence a person to comply, these are divided into three main areas are:
a) Characteristics of the Individual: This area is related to nationality, sex, race, etc.
b) Characteristics of the Group: has to do with group size, unanimity (degree of consensus, etc.). It is important to note that because of the presence of a partner within the group is more likely that a majority response is affected by the pressure of a minority. Some things to consider:
- The larger the group, greater conformity
- A greater number of people who adhere to a position closer conformity
- If there is unanimity in the group, greater conformity
c) Characteristics of the Relationship between the Individual and Group: An individual will comply if this will ensure acceptance by the group. If the person is still high status are more likely to be accepted that if one is low, on the other hand, the means will be status aceptados en parte. Ante lo cual podemos decir que a mayor estatus menor es la probabilidad de conformarse puesto que no es necesario para pertenecer a un grupo y ser aceptado.
Pero también hay que responder a la siguiente interrogante: ¿Por qué se conforman las personas?
Hay distintos tipos de influencia, está por un lado la influencia informacional que se da en personas que tiene poca confianza en sus creencias y esta prima al momento de querer obtener respuesta a ciertas interrogantes, existe presión por parte del grupo y le permite tener a la persona una percepción exacta de la realidad ya que tiene que ver con la forma de verificar un estímulo, This can give an immediate (ie there is a universal response or one for the stimulus) and compliance would be weak, if the stimulus check is impossible from the outset (answers ambiguous) is less likely that there is compliance, but that is strong in the individual, it must believe that their response to certain stimuli is not correct and there is only one universal response, but it must feel that the other group members are more competent than him (here lies the little confidence itself).
can also speak of the normative influence relates to settle to avoid punishment and get reward from the group, this is less likely to be private acceptance (not in the informational influence). It is important to say that these two types of influence depends on the individual group one way or another.
Hay distintos tipos de influencia, está por un lado la influencia informacional que se da en personas que tiene poca confianza en sus creencias y esta prima al momento de querer obtener respuesta a ciertas interrogantes, existe presión por parte del grupo y le permite tener a la persona una percepción exacta de la realidad ya que tiene que ver con la forma de verificar un estímulo, This can give an immediate (ie there is a universal response or one for the stimulus) and compliance would be weak, if the stimulus check is impossible from the outset (answers ambiguous) is less likely that there is compliance, but that is strong in the individual, it must believe that their response to certain stimuli is not correct and there is only one universal response, but it must feel that the other group members are more competent than him (here lies the little confidence itself).
can also speak of the normative influence relates to settle to avoid punishment and get reward from the group, this is less likely to be private acceptance (not in the informational influence). It is important to say that these two types of influence depends on the individual group one way or another.
Finally appoint the genetic explanation of conformity , Moscovici through this explanation we mean that compliance is a concept that emerged from negotiations between the individual and the group against conflict, but to leave this should be a standard of objectivity, which allows us to give a single answer to a question, on the other hand, the group should be nomic, that is, with rules and a strongly internalized and affirming this position and if we refer to the individual it must be anomic having a weak internal position.
could appoint normalization as another form of influence, this is a reciprocal influence by group members, which occurs when there is no consensus on an accurate and unique response to a question, but apart from This group participants must have the same powers, the same behavior and a weak commitment to its position.
Taking the above letter is true that compliance takes place at any level provided it complies with the characteristics of individuals and groups. Apparently the most important features is related to the weak commitment to position itself as compared to subjects that are beginning to waver in their beliefs and doubt resulting in lower confidence in themselves, this leads them to look at the behavior and thoughts of others if they are more confident which also causes them to have the support of others in the group, this does not mean that there must be pressure from others to the subject line.
From here we address two edges of the line having to do with the advantages and disadvantages. As noted, this form of influence allows us to be accepted by groups which is the only way to go, but be careful because this can also play against as it may be taken by other members of the group as merely a way to enter this being rejected. Another disadvantage has to do with the difficulties in carrying out the process of differentiating the group level, which prevents the individual may feel as unique and capable of living and acting according to his ideals which can be risky in some occasions as to be carried away by others may take a wrong decision being that if he had followed his thoughts would be correct, this may have to do with lack of self confidence and insecurity. In my opinion one of the most important consequences at the group level is about stagnating or emergence of these, by that I mean if there are groups with stable rules, clear and consistent is easier for individuals to conform because they are against limits and clear vision, ie a particular paradigm that makes follow certain guidelines in their ways of thinking and acting, but as we all know time is not static, change leads at various levels and what happens in the case that time continue to move and the paradigm remains the same, I mean here's the main difficulty of the subject, sometimes a character would be good to bring innovative paradigm shift at so that the group exists and can be tailored to the external environment, what I meant to be structurally mating performance level, because if not, go away.
could appoint normalization as another form of influence, this is a reciprocal influence by group members, which occurs when there is no consensus on an accurate and unique response to a question, but apart from This group participants must have the same powers, the same behavior and a weak commitment to its position.
Taking the above letter is true that compliance takes place at any level provided it complies with the characteristics of individuals and groups. Apparently the most important features is related to the weak commitment to position itself as compared to subjects that are beginning to waver in their beliefs and doubt resulting in lower confidence in themselves, this leads them to look at the behavior and thoughts of others if they are more confident which also causes them to have the support of others in the group, this does not mean that there must be pressure from others to the subject line.
From here we address two edges of the line having to do with the advantages and disadvantages. As noted, this form of influence allows us to be accepted by groups which is the only way to go, but be careful because this can also play against as it may be taken by other members of the group as merely a way to enter this being rejected. Another disadvantage has to do with the difficulties in carrying out the process of differentiating the group level, which prevents the individual may feel as unique and capable of living and acting according to his ideals which can be risky in some occasions as to be carried away by others may take a wrong decision being that if he had followed his thoughts would be correct, this may have to do with lack of self confidence and insecurity. In my opinion one of the most important consequences at the group level is about stagnating or emergence of these, by that I mean if there are groups with stable rules, clear and consistent is easier for individuals to conform because they are against limits and clear vision, ie a particular paradigm that makes follow certain guidelines in their ways of thinking and acting, but as we all know time is not static, change leads at various levels and what happens in the case that time continue to move and the paradigm remains the same, I mean here's the main difficulty of the subject, sometimes a character would be good to bring innovative paradigm shift at so that the group exists and can be tailored to the external environment, what I meant to be structurally mating performance level, because if not, go away.
0 comments:
Post a Comment